For many clinicians, the mental load never seems to turn off. That’s why it's so important that the systems we use actually have a meaningful impact.
One of the most helpful tools for this are AI medical scribes. When they work well, these ambient documentation tools can take a huge administrative burden off your plate — so you can focus on patient care.
To confirm the best fit, we pulled real clinician reviews created by clinicians on their own channels, and worked with a nurse practitioner who tested Freed and Heidi AI across real primary care encounters. This review reflects a combination of those personal experiences, how each tool performed, and what ultimately led those clinicians to choose Freed.
To fairly compare Freed and Heidi, we scoured reviews and asked a practicing nurse practitioner to use both tools in her primary care practice across various visit types:
She tested each AI medical scribe over multiple clinic days (primary care setting) and focused on the following criteria:
"[Freed] might be the medical scribe that actually delivers on its promises." — Savage Reviews
Below is an overview of what stood out during testing.
"The accuracy is legitimately impressive. I'm talking about clean SOAP notes and after visit summaries that actual sound human written. The real-time transcription works for both in-person and telehealth sessions, which is huge if you're running a hybrid practice." — Savage Reviews


NPs experience:
I preferred Freed’s structured layout because it felt calmer, cleaner, and easier to skim — which mattered on packed clinic days. I needed to edit less, and the notes consistently matched how I chart.
Similar to the note quality, there are a few differences when it comes to ease of use of Heidi vs. Freed.
NPs experience:
As someone prone to decision fatigue by mid-afternoon, simplicity matters. I found Freed allowed me to stay in “patient mode” rather than “tech mode,” which made charting feel lighter.
Both tools generate notes within 1–2 minutes after each visit.
Across multiple clinic days, the nurse practitioner estimated that she saved about 5 minutes per patient on documentation — simply by not typing or dictating. With 20 patients in a day, those minutes add up fast.
She still reviewed every note carefully before signing. Both platforms made this step easier.
NPs experience:
Time savings were similar, but Freed’s formatting made my review process faster because it was easier to skim.
This is where most clinicians notice the biggest differences.
Freed offers robust customization that still feels simple:

Heidi also supports customization through templates and edits.

NPs experience:
Heidi’s customization tools are powerful, but I personally found them overwhelming. Freed gave me the structure I wanted without requiring me to build everything from scratch. I especially liked that Magic edit could tighten my subjective, add an exam, or clean up formatting without me doing manual rewriting.
This is one if, if not the most important category for all clinicians. Both Freed and Heidi are committed to HIPAA compliance and the highest data security standards.
NPs experience:
Both companies present themselves as privacy-focused, and I felt comfortable using both tools during testing.
Freed also made me feel more connected to the team behind the product. I’ve been invited to provide feedback, and I’ve seen several of my suggestions implemented. Their community and responsiveness made a big difference in building trust.
Note: we cannot assess or make claims about Heidi’s compliance. We can only share my experience and what each company states publicly.
This is one of the biggest questions clinicians have.
Pricing depends on whether you’re an individual or part of a small practice.
Freed's pricing model is:
For Heidi, some features (custom templates, Ask Heidi) are limited on the free version. Freed includes unlimited notes, Magic edit, full template access, and all customization tools. The 7-day free trial was enough for me to test it thoroughly.
NPs experience:
For my workflow, Freed’s combination of ease, organization, and customization made it feel like the better value.
After testing both tools, the nurse practitioner ultimately chose Freed — and she's now used it consistently for over 1.5 years.
Here’s why it clicked for her, and 25,000+ clinicians across the U.S.:
We always recommend that clinicians try both tools and see what fits their style. We're confident that you'll love Freed's ease of use, note accuracy, and powerful features.
If you’re drowning in documentation or dreaming of getting your evenings back, an AI medical scribe can genuinely help.
🔗 Try Freed free for 7 days — no credit card needed.
You deserve a charting process that fits into your life, not one that takes over your life.
For many clinicians, the mental load never seems to turn off. That’s why it's so important that the systems we use actually have a meaningful impact.
One of the most helpful tools for this are AI medical scribes. When they work well, these ambient documentation tools can take a huge administrative burden off your plate — so you can focus on patient care.
To confirm the best fit, we pulled real clinician reviews created by clinicians on their own channels, and worked with a nurse practitioner who tested Freed and Heidi AI across real primary care encounters. This review reflects a combination of those personal experiences, how each tool performed, and what ultimately led those clinicians to choose Freed.
To fairly compare Freed and Heidi, we scoured reviews and asked a practicing nurse practitioner to use both tools in her primary care practice across various visit types:
She tested each AI medical scribe over multiple clinic days (primary care setting) and focused on the following criteria:
"[Freed] might be the medical scribe that actually delivers on its promises." — Savage Reviews
Below is an overview of what stood out during testing.
"The accuracy is legitimately impressive. I'm talking about clean SOAP notes and after visit summaries that actual sound human written. The real-time transcription works for both in-person and telehealth sessions, which is huge if you're running a hybrid practice." — Savage Reviews


NPs experience:
I preferred Freed’s structured layout because it felt calmer, cleaner, and easier to skim — which mattered on packed clinic days. I needed to edit less, and the notes consistently matched how I chart.
Similar to the note quality, there are a few differences when it comes to ease of use of Heidi vs. Freed.
NPs experience:
As someone prone to decision fatigue by mid-afternoon, simplicity matters. I found Freed allowed me to stay in “patient mode” rather than “tech mode,” which made charting feel lighter.
Both tools generate notes within 1–2 minutes after each visit.
Across multiple clinic days, the nurse practitioner estimated that she saved about 5 minutes per patient on documentation — simply by not typing or dictating. With 20 patients in a day, those minutes add up fast.
She still reviewed every note carefully before signing. Both platforms made this step easier.
NPs experience:
Time savings were similar, but Freed’s formatting made my review process faster because it was easier to skim.
This is where most clinicians notice the biggest differences.
Freed offers robust customization that still feels simple:

Heidi also supports customization through templates and edits.

NPs experience:
Heidi’s customization tools are powerful, but I personally found them overwhelming. Freed gave me the structure I wanted without requiring me to build everything from scratch. I especially liked that Magic edit could tighten my subjective, add an exam, or clean up formatting without me doing manual rewriting.
This is one if, if not the most important category for all clinicians. Both Freed and Heidi are committed to HIPAA compliance and the highest data security standards.
NPs experience:
Both companies present themselves as privacy-focused, and I felt comfortable using both tools during testing.
Freed also made me feel more connected to the team behind the product. I’ve been invited to provide feedback, and I’ve seen several of my suggestions implemented. Their community and responsiveness made a big difference in building trust.
Note: we cannot assess or make claims about Heidi’s compliance. We can only share my experience and what each company states publicly.
This is one of the biggest questions clinicians have.
Pricing depends on whether you’re an individual or part of a small practice.
Freed's pricing model is:
For Heidi, some features (custom templates, Ask Heidi) are limited on the free version. Freed includes unlimited notes, Magic edit, full template access, and all customization tools. The 7-day free trial was enough for me to test it thoroughly.
NPs experience:
For my workflow, Freed’s combination of ease, organization, and customization made it feel like the better value.
After testing both tools, the nurse practitioner ultimately chose Freed — and she's now used it consistently for over 1.5 years.
Here’s why it clicked for her, and 25,000+ clinicians across the U.S.:
We always recommend that clinicians try both tools and see what fits their style. We're confident that you'll love Freed's ease of use, note accuracy, and powerful features.
If you’re drowning in documentation or dreaming of getting your evenings back, an AI medical scribe can genuinely help.
🔗 Try Freed free for 7 days — no credit card needed.
You deserve a charting process that fits into your life, not one that takes over your life.
Frequently asked questions from clinicians and medical practitioners.